The title of this feast is apparently suggested by two sentences from the day’s readings. One is from the Second Reading: “God sent forth his Son, born of woman.” The other is from the gospel: “Mary kept all these things, pondering them in her heart.” Only the former sentence has relevance to the Theotokos, for it speaks of Mary’s giving birth to the Son of God. The latter sentence treats Mary rather as the paradigm of faith, and therefore of the Christian believer and the true Israel.
The calendar of the Episcopal Church uses the same Gospel, which is traditional for this day, but has a different title for the feast: The Holy Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ. This takes its cue from the last verse of the Gospel, as did the old title, the Circumcision. Whatever the precise title of the day, its major concern is still the birth of Christ as the beginning of the saving act of God.
This reading comprises the Aaronic blessing, which, like the tersanctus of Isa 6 with its threefold form, is a remarkable anticipation of the Trinitarian faith of the Church. Special attention is directed, in the caption to the reading, to the last verse: “So shall they put my name upon the people of Israel, and I will bless them,” which suggests an emphasis on the holy name.
People often ask glibly, “What’s in a name?” In biblical thought the answer is “Everything!” The name stands for the whole person, his/her character and power of personality. The name of God is the Being of God himself, all that he has manifested himself to be in his revelation in salvation history, culminating in the Christ-event.
To “bless” means to invoke upon the faithful all that God is and all that he has done for his people. The name of Jesus is the name of the triune God made manifest and present in saving power. This is surely an appropriate blessing for the new civil year.
This psalm is also used on the sixth Sunday of Easter in series C. As the response shows, the emphasis is on prayer for God’s blessing, which fits in perfectly with the first reading.
This is the traditional lesson for the first Sunday after Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God , where it has been retained in the Episcopal Lectionary. According to recent scholarly investigation, this passage is a pre-Pauline creedal formula that Paul has expanded. The words “born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law” suggests the particular preoccupations of the Apostle, and therefore were probably insertions by him. This leaves us with the formula:
God sent forth his Son
(born of woman)
that we might receive adoption as sons.
One can see from this that the purpose clause follows immediately upon the sending clause: the Son was sent that we might become sons and daughters. This purpose clause is very important, for it indicates that the nativity is not just a beautiful story devoid of connection with our own existence.
People today ask, “What has the birth of Christ got to do with me?”
The answer is that on it depends my whole status before God as his adopted child. He became human through a human birth precisely in order that we might be elevated to the status of children of God.
For further comment on this profound theological theme, see the second reading of the Mass at Dawn on Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God .
But we cannot dismiss Paul’s addition about the law as having no relevance. It points toward the event mentioned at the end of the Gospel—Jesus’ circumcision. In this he is shown to be “born under the law.”
In his incarnation and earthly life, he places himself under human limitations and enters into human culture, including all the restrictions of human freedom that characterize human life.
For Paul, the law was precisely such a restriction. It told people what to do but left them powerless to do it.
Only by complete submission to human bondage could the Son of God liberate people from it, for only he remained truly free, and only he is therefore able, in Van Buren’s suggestive metaphor, to pass on the contagion of that freedom to others.
This Gospel is almost identical with that of the second Mass of Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God . The only differences are that it starts at verse 16 instead of verse 15, and that it goes on to include verse 21, the circumcision and naming of Jesus. This is clearly meant to be the climactic verse of today’s reading.